Extension Granted for Decision on Mahua Moitra Chargesheet
The Delhi High Court has extended the time for the Lokpal to decide on whether to grant sanction for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to file a chargesheet against Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra regarding the alleged cash-for-query scam. This decision, made on January 23, 2026, gives the Lokpal an additional two months to make its determination.
Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar stated that no further requests for time extensions will be entertained. The court aims to ensure a timely resolution of the matter, which has garnered considerable public interest.
Background of the Case
The case against Moitra involves allegations that she engaged in corrupt practices by soliciting cash and gifts in exchange for her parliamentary questions. Specifically, it’s claimed that the MP compromised her parliamentary privileges by sharing her Lok Sabha login credentials with businessman Darshan Hiranandani.
The CBI had registered an FIR on March 21, 2024, based on a reference from the Lokpal which led to the investigation into the cash-for-query allegations. The agency submitted its report to the Lokpal in July 2025, prompting the ongoing legal scrutiny.
High Court’s Previous Orders
Prior to this latest ruling, the High Court set aside a November 2025 order by the Lokpal that had granted sanction for the CBI to file a chargesheet against Moitra. The court emphasized the necessity for the Lokpal to comply strictly with the provisions of Section 20 of the Lokpal Act regarding the sanctions.
Citing a “clear departure” from mandated procedures outlined in the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act of 2013, the justices instructed the Lokpal to reassess its decision within a one-month timeframe, which has now been extended by an additional two months.
Legal Proceedings and Responses
Both the legal representatives for Moitra and the CBI have indicated they do not contest the Lokpal’s request for more time. The court reiterated the importance of adhering to proper legal protocol in handling such allegations against a sitting member of Parliament.
A significant aspect of the case revolves around its implications for public trust and transparency in governance. As a two-time MP from Krishnanagar in West Bengal, Moitra faces additional scrutiny due to her position and involvement in these grave allegations.
The Allegations and Specifics of the Scam
The cash-for-query allegations allege that Moitra received undue advantages from Hiranandani in exchange for asking specific questions in the Lok Sabha. The situation presents serious concerns regarding national security, given that the accused reportedly compromised her parliamentary privileges.
Moitra has publicly challenged the allegations, arguing they are a ploy to discredit her and impede her parliamentary functions. The TMC leader has consistently maintained her innocence while using the platform to criticize what she describes as political vendetta.
Reactions from Political Leaders and the TMC
Following the court’s extension of the Lokpal’s timeframe, several prominent figures from the TMC have come forward to support Moitra. They claim that the ongoing legal battle is indicative of a broader agenda to stifle dissenting voices within the opposition.
A senior party official stated, “This extension is a reminder that due process must be followed. We are confident that justice will eventually prevail and Mahua Moitra’s reputation will be vindicated.”
Public and Social Media Reaction
The public response to the allegations has been mixed, with many rallying in support of Moitra while others call for stringent measures against political corruption. Social media campaigns have intensified, showcasing strong opinions on both sides of the argument and calling for transparency in the investigation process.
A Twitter trend has emerged calling for clarity on the Lokpal’s functions, with users demanding a transparent accounting of the sanction process and timelines moving forward.
Upcoming Developments and Court’s Expectations
Looking ahead, the Lokpal must finalize its decision within the newly allotted time. Legal experts have noted that the outcome will be critical, not only for Moitra but also for the standards governing parliamentary conduct in India.
The court’s insistence on adhering to legal protocols signals heightened scrutiny of institutional processes surrounding corruption allegations, especially involving public figures.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s latest ruling extends a critical period for the Lokpal, further adding to the complexity of an already high-profile case. The unfolding situation will likely shape future discussions regarding political accountability in India.
As the deadline approaches, all eyes will be on the Lokpal’s actions and decisions, determining the course of this case which could have significant repercussions for India’s political landscape.